Gene Editing — Now FDA-blessed.
In December 2023, the CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing therapy, known as exa-cel, received FDA approval. Developed collaboratively by CRISPR Therapeutics (Zug, Switzerland) and Vertex Pharmaceuticals (Boston, USA), this treatment targets a gene crucial for maintaining the function and disk-like shape of red blood cells. Specifically designed to treat sickle cell disease, exa-cel’s approval by the US FDA, following its earlier endorsement by the MHRA in the UK, represents a significant regulatory advancement in the treatment of genetic disorders.
Our gene editing industry report presents a snapshot of the current landscape and the promising future of this transformative field.
Key Highlights:
- The top-5 publicly traded CRISPR companies — Intellia, CRISPR Therapeutics, Editas, Beam, and Prime Medicine — have displayed varied market cap dynamics since early 2023. Notably, CRISPR Therapeutics and Editas grew by 1.5x and 1.3x, respectively, while Prime Medicine experienced an almost 2x decline.
- 26 gene editing clinical trials remain active predominantly focusing on ex vivo strategies (20 out of 26) and blood indications (18 out of 26).
- Editas appears to have struggled with its AAV-based therapy trials, in contrast to Intellia, which leads the in vivo editing field with 3 out of 6 trials ongoing.
- Feng Zhang and MIT are likely ahead in the gene editing patent war, overshadowing Nobel Prize winners Jennifer Doudna and Emmanuelle Charpentier, while contributions from Virginijus Šikšnys remain less known.
- Large insertions and epigenetic editing are gaining prominence, evidenced by eight VC rounds of over $50M and notable academic research.
- Fanzor, emerging from Feng Zhang’s lab, is poised to become a rival to CRISPR/Cas technology, reigniting discussions about novel gene editors of eukaryotic origin.
- The non-viral, non-liver delivery remains the challenge — while ReCode Therapeutics being the only company in clinics with lung-targeting SORT LNPs, 89% of the 3900+ gene therapies in development still rely on AAV-based methods.
Please refer to our full report.